Payment plans now available. Click here for more information.

What Today's Supreme Court Ruling Means For Abortion Rights

Victoria Pappas
Victoria Pappas Law Student, Cardozo School of Law
I am a current law student interested in intellectual property and tech law.
Supreme Court Abortion Ruling
On June 29th, 2020, the Supreme Court decided the case of June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo. In a 5-4 ruling, the majority opinion held that the Louisiana Act 620 is unconstitutional. 

Some legal experts said if the Supreme Court had upheld the law, it would have closed nearly every abortion clinic in Louisiana.

The Lousiana law stated “that every physician who performs or induces an abortion shall ‘have active admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than thirty miles from the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.’”

Admitting privileges are an agreement between doctors and hospitals. These agreements allow doctors to admit patients to hospitals and allow patients to receive “diagnostic and surgical services” at hospitals the doctors have this agreement with. 

Justice Breyer, writing for the majority, explained that a lot of hospitals would deny these privileges to doctors because of its disapproval of abortions.

Despite personal opinons on abortion, federal law allows and protects the right to have an abortion. The Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade declared that the Constitution gives women legal right to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment
 
If the Louisiana law were deemed constitutional, only one abortion clinic and one physician in the state would remain open and continue providing abortions. One doctor and one clinic would not be able to provide the approximate 10,000 people a year who receive abortion services. 

This means that women would have to travel to another state in order to recieve abortion services. 

Abortion clincs and doctors challenged this law arguing it was unnessary, does not benefit women’s health, and makes it very difficult for to get an abortion.

While this case was still pending, the Supreme Court ruled a very similar law in Texas was also unconstitutional. Justice Breyer, also writing for the majority in this case, stated that the Louisiana statute is “almost word-for-word identical to Texas’s admitting-privileges law.” 

In this case, Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, the Supreme Court held that the Texas law makes it extremely and unnecessarily difficult for women to get abortions, violting section 1 of the 14th Amendment. 

In the case of June Medical Services, LLC Justice Breyer stated the findings of fact made by the District Court “mirror those made in Whole Woman’s Health in every relevant respect and require the same result.” 

Therefore, it was held that the Louisiana law, similar to the Texas one, was unconstitutional as it placed an “undue burden” on women to receive abortion services. 

Overall this decision helps protect the right to have an abortion. It is easier for doctors and patients to give and receive abortion services in Louisiana. It allows clinics and doctors in the state to stay open and preform abortions. Additionally, doctors will have access to admitting privileges in more hospitals than if the law went into effect.

The Importance of Justice Roberts

This ruling came as a shock to some since Justice Roberts, a conservative judge, sided with the 4  more liberal judges to make up the majority votes. He was essentially the deciding vote. 

Justice Roberts interestingly enough did not agree with the majority opinion in the Whole Women’s Health case. 

He wrote a separate opinion in June Medical Services, LLC explaining why he chose to strike down the Louisiana statute. Although he did not agree that the previous Texas law was unconstitutional, he stated that the question for the court in this case was about following the law and ruling made in Whole Women’s Health. 

He based his reasoning on the important legal principle of stare decisis. This principle, as Justice Roberts states, “requires us to treat like cases alike.” The law in question here was exactly like the law in Whole Women’s Health as they both severely restricted abortion access. 

Therefore, if the Texas law was deemed unconstitutional, the Louisiana law must also be unconstitutional. Unless a previous case uses bad reasoning, courts are required to follow the laws stated in those cases; a case cannot be overruled just because a judge does not agree with the outcome. 

Court Buddy is here to connect you with an experienced and trusted lawyer who can help you at an affordable rate. The company assists with the management of your case and lawyer relationship. Your lawyer will assess your legal issue in a timely and confidential manner, explain why you need or do not need a lawyer, and only charge you for the legal services performed and associated out of pocket fees. This article is intended to convey general information and does not constitute legal advice.

Ready to get started? We’re here to help.

Related Blogs

  • Chris Wojcik
  • |
  • 03 July, 2020
4 Tips For Celebrating The 4th Of July During COVID-19

It's not a carefree 4th of July this year. Coronavirus cases are rising around the nation (and world), despite months of efforts to flatten t...

  • Stephanie Cortes
  • |
  • 17 June, 2020
Restraining Orders During The Coronavirus: What You Need To Know.

Many courthouses across the country remain closed, leading some victims of domestic abuse feeling powerless and hopeless.   Fortunately, f...

  • Katie Lyon
  • |
  • 13 June, 2020
Top 5 Questions And Answers About Family Law Presented During Court Buddy's May Meet-Up

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Court Buddy began hosting monthly virtual Legal Meet-Ups to help people get advice from real lawyers on pre...

  • Genevieve A. Suzuki
  • |
  • 22 June, 2020
Commentary: School Closures For COVID-19 Should Make Parents Reconsider Their Custody Battles

Original Publication: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2020-03-19/covid19-coronavirus-custody-battles-school-closures-court ...

  • Erin Levine
  • |
  • 15 June, 2020
You Can Still Get A Divorce During COVID-19. But You Need To Get Moving, Now.

This is going to sound crazy, but it’s true: many traditional lawyers are not equipped to handle clients remotely. (Think paper files, on-p...

  • Court Buddy
  • |
  • 15 June, 2020
5 Common Situations Where You'll Probably Want A Lawyer

The thought of hiring a lawyer can be daunting, and too often, we might not even know that we need an attorney. Here are five common situations...

Hablamos Español

Hablamos Español

Still have questions?

Call us toll-free at (866) 653-3017 to speak with a Client Success Specialist today.

Hablamos Español

Hablamos Español

Reviews
Overall great experience from beginning to end! On the plus, I won my case!"

Overall great experience from beginning to end! On the plus, I won my case!"

Jonathan R, California

Court Buddy made it easy for me to handle my tough court case. I feel like I'm not alone."

Court Buddy made it easy for me to handle my tough court case. I feel like I'm not alone."

Silvia S, California